The Winners and Losers in Syria's Ceasefire
By Robin Wright
By Robin Wright
Six years into the world’s grisliest war and worst
humanitarian crisis, a ceasefire went into effect on Friday in Syria. Russian
President Vladimir Putin, its co-mastermind, admitted that it is “fragile.” Two
previous ceasefires—in February and September—lasted only weeks.The odds are
stacked against this one bringing an end to all the fighting, since it deals
with only one of multiple wars inside Syria, which have so far killed an
estimated four hundred thousand people. But the current initiative—brokered by
Russia and Turkey with Iranian support—is different from past efforts. It
signals big shifts in the basics of the Syrian tragedy.
For now, Russia has “won” Syria. Moscow escalated its
involvement, in September, 2015, by providing the government of President
Bashar al-Assad the air power he needed to pummel the rebels. The pretext was
to bomb the Islamic State; it was a ruse. Some ninety per cent of Russian
airstrikes have been against the rebels challenging the Syrian government.
Assad could not have regained control of Aleppo—the country’s largest city and
former commercial center—earlier this month without Russia. And the rebel rout
in Aleppo changed the strategic reality enough to allow the Russians to step in
and take the diplomatic lead on behalf of its most important ally in the Middle
East.
Read on....